Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:59

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Could Mauricio Pochettino leave USMNT for Tottenham?: 'It's not realistic' - FOX Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Solar 'cannonballs' may have stripped Mars of its water, long-awaited study reveals - Live Science
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Renck: If J.K. Dobbins stays healthy, he’ll be reason Broncos win AFC West - The Denver Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump’s 50% steel tariffs are coming for your next fridge and dishwasher - CNN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
These are the key witnesses who testified against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs so far - CNN
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is Trump so disliked worldwide?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Musk-Trump Spat Hits New High As Musk’s Ex Piles On - HuffPost